In February of this year, I intentionally proposed a statement in paragraph form, knowing most if not all others would think it nonsense. Preposterous. Irrational. However, the statement was a display of higher intelligence. An example of higher intelligence quite real. And the statement, I offered for the pondering and the examining almost a month, without explanation.

I offer the statement again now, but with a following explanation in essay form below. If you missed this experience, you may want to allow yourself some time to see if you can reach the meaning and recognize the statement true. A statement quite simplistic.

The statement is: Voicing the word freedom with the intention of popularity, respect and encouragement is not with wisdom. And celebrating the word freedom with the intention of popularity, respect and encouragement is not with wisdom. Especially not, with wisdom the highest as is divine.

Allow yourself some time to ponder, if you will. And possibly you'll surprise yourself, your thoughts about this, about how such a statement could possibly be intelligent so. Clearly intelligent so.

For those ready, simply scroll down.

Influence Most Intelligent

Several nations on earth respect individual freedom. And by these nations, freedom is influenced intentionally so the citizenry. However, I recommend freedom be more intelligently influenced, including with foresight for the sake of posterity.

Voicing the word freedom with the intention of popularity, respect and encouragement is not with wisdom. And celebrating the word freedom with the intention of popularity, respect and encouragement is not with wisdom. Especially not, with wisdom the highest as is divine.

Quite a statement, and a statement before you, but a statement provable and clearly so. However, also the following paragraphs will not seem to make much sense introductively, with sure clarity. Though this will pass, and sooner than you can now expect, as you continue thru this explanative essay.

Enjoy your experience.

Voicing freedom as valuable so, individually valuable so, messages that one is not worthy as a human being. Not only freedom oneself must be, but freedom also successfully so as oneself. For as oneself, to be true. Those successful as freedom, certainly do as they want, certainly have what they want, certainly are able so as freedom, living the truth freedom. And are quite the matter. What else can freedom mean about oneself? What else can freedom as truth, as the real, mean?

To identify as an American, one must identify with freedom? Freedom, freedom the voicing, repetitively heard by others, about others, and for about oneself. And freedom, respecting truth, psychologically messages. To be like others, one must be oneself so. Oneself so. And the success this, becomes important so. Valued so.

Psychologically messaged so, from oneself a child, the question rarely occurs in the many, "How much freedom is enough, to be truly oneself?"

Others are freedom, but how much freedom is oneself? And by oneself freedom, are others a matter much, compared oneself? Should others be a matter much, a matter much at all, compared oneself? Others obstacle not the freedom oneself? Though, if others cooperate, more freedom one can be.

By an elaboration progressively different. Others are freedom, but how much freedom is oneself? And by oneself freedom, are others a matter much, compared oneself? Should others be a matter much, a matter much at all, compared oneself? Or, others need matter less, certainly some less, compared oneself. Oneself considered first and primarily so. Oneself considered more importantly so. And this others need understand. Because the freedom oneself, as oneself, matters so. Is valued so, by oneself.

Certainly others must understand, because certainly one should be true to oneself, should be true with oneself. Is Shakespeare not appreciated so, supportively so? The freedom oneself, as oneself, matters so. Is valued so, by oneself. For oneself true, true as an American.

To know thyself, how much freedom is enough? Considering oneself for as oneself, how much freedom is enough? Because freedom is the point, is the importance. And one must be freedom successfully so, for one to be real, to be true, and not a lie. And others must understand. Though, also other Americans are freedom, identify as freedom for each themselves true. Certainly, one's thinking is not wrong about this, freedom celebrated so in America. Strongly oneself, as oneself, one must be.

That, including the problems of that, is seeable more clearly by freedom messaged differently. By voiced differently...

The words equal freedoms messages a life different, an experience different, compared only the word freedom voiced repetitively so. And heard repetitively so, from oneself a child until an adult. And after an adult lifelong. For as oneself. For as oneself too. For belongingly, as such an American too.

A nation of freedom, of citizenry freedom, is about lawful equal freedoms. The identification of worth is oneself able with others by equal freedoms respected, as of course includes oneself respected, and is a different voicing. And this also messages life for fair reasonably so among others. A messaging about life an experience of plurality, as is the truth, than a singularity. Than a singularity identification.

Individuality is a good word, beingly so. However, life is a plural experience among others. Among other individuals. This is reality true as has been and as will be.

Knowledge is by the words equal freedoms, simplistic knowledge, for how one needs be to belong, to be included, to be respected, and to be worthy as an American too. Simplistic knowledge, though highly intelligent. The word equal and the word freedom together have a much different messaging in the mind, in the thinking, compared only the word freedom. And combined, knowledge are the two words. Equal and freedoms, each word a specific meaning, a specific truth, combined affords knowledge for how to belong, what is expected of oneself, and what one should expect from others, from other Americans. And equal freedoms are constitutionally real, behavioral and expectational knowledge constitutionally real, lostness from oneself as an American and from the great advancing class of those having founded America not occurring to oneself, hearing the voicing. And repetitively hearing the voicing.

Equal freedoms the voicing is educational, is ever so much simplistically educational, this true, though by common language. By common word usage. No question is the meaning and the intent of equal freedoms voiced. And not confusional of meaning nor intent is equal freedoms voiced, though heard repetitively. Lostness cannot occur nearly the like as by identifying with only the word freedom as oneself, for as oneself successfully so. And one can know oneself worthy, as though naturally so, easily so, for participational in life as a adult.

What is expected of oneself, as an adult, for worthy as an American adult? Becoming an adult, those now young adults, attempting to identify with others as freedom, as individuals so, extremely so as becomes abnormally so, to be a worthy adult too. Freedom, the word freedom, their latching onto. By that, is a wonder still, young adults have difficulty respecting their parents as they grow and "feel their oats"?

By only freedom the identification, how much must oneself be oneself, and recognizably by others, for one satisfied one is successfully oneself as freedom? As the truth freedom? Must one be specially admired? Must one be specially attentioned? Specially recognized somehow? Applauded, in a fashion? Perhaps specially recognized by yielded-to, the worth of oneself yielded to, respected so? And, certainly likening a sin it would be, to disturb or interfere with oneself, because oneself is freedom. Cannot others, including parents, understand? "What's wrong with them?!"

Freedom are you? Then, why are you not more freedom? And more freedom? And freedom the more, successfully so, as is the real? And evidently, as others can see, as others can readily recognize, successfully so? You, such an individual, such a one.

Though alas, if one can do anything, others cannot. If one is freedom so, and successfully so, others cannot be. Because for oneself freedom so, others must yield to you, must allow you, must cooperate. Must respect you. And must respect you so, you as freedom so, more than themselves. They must. And they must understand that they must.

They must, or you are not successful as an American, as freedom. As yourself.

Psychological so is that, as can continue further, more depthfully in oneself...

Such a worth, you must be, for to be true. To be real. And you must message that you value this so. As yourself, for as yourself, that you value this so. By your attitude, your stance, the occasional look in your eyes, and perhaps by the individuality of yourself an independence so. A stand alone person so.

A battle of wills, by freedom the identification as oneself. But none can be, can ever alone be, a pure win. Because the morrow is, and alas others are. As though countless others are. The success oneself, as oneself, in danger of fleeting so.

Freedom, but as one becomes a young adult, becoming lost. Becoming unlikable, except by those also becoming lost, identifying with each other's problems so. And importances of oneselves so. The problems and importances of oneself freedom, of oneself for as oneself so. For being oneself so, successfully so, and finding oneself in difference. Oneself the real, the pursuance, and finding oneself in difference.

It is true, and clearly the truth, difference is real. But is oneself real as difference so? Perhaps one becomes true to difference, than true to oneself, and this discovered easier, more readily doable, impatient so oneself to become "an adult". Individually so, and uniquely so, an adult. And recognized "as oneself". To finish growing, to finish becoming, and to begin to have one's life as oneself. To having finished, and now oneself recognizably so.

Among others becoming lost, supportive each other so. Appreciating sameness as oneself different. A home feeling more homey, than home of parenting, parenting intentionally still. Where oneself can be usual, a difference too much not. Where oneself as freedom is understood, as should be understood. Or so, as the experience of this illusions. Such comradery, by those becoming alone so, as though having been aloned so by others, perhaps by parents. The reason known not oneself, thus must be others, somehow and however others. And the variety of complaints about others, in defense of oneself so, respected and recognized as important, as important so. Though, the reason is not others intentionally so. But alas, unable to see this, blinded in mind. Unable to put one's finger on the problem, the real problem, so to speak.

What is freedom if not the experience of nothing. A hindrance not, an interference not, an obstacling not. But how can oneself, psychologically influenced so, put one's finger on nothing, the real problem as is nothing?

Alas, as freedom individually so, and becoming freedom and freedom the more, and the more...    An end is not, a bottom is not, but lostness is. Nothingness, but nothingness is the pursuance, the pursuance for the happiness oneself. Though, among those the lost, home is. Comradery is. For a while, the feeling of home, such a restful place, such a comforting place.

One was effected, but by what? Seemingly so, someone or others are responsible. And should be accountable. However, suppose they are innocent, truly innocent, and have not known what they were doing? And would never have done such a thing, themselves trying to be good, simply good Americans so. Swept-up in celebrative thinking of a glorious past, a glorious revolution that birthed a magnificent new nation.

Freedom, but life devalued by freedom. What can be the answer? If not about freedom, then what are we about as Americans? For this, the words equal freedoms are already recognizable as helpful so. However, for better clarity, perhaps in the past, such a past as is American, an answer is more clearly seeable...

Such a thinking, such a destiny the becoming, is not what was intentionally influenced and supported so by those having founded America. Their voices were originally liberty from tyranny. Or, interpretively, freedom from tyranny. And to see this, we need attention the word from, as is in from tyranny. Because after their liberty from tyranny, a permanent government of a nation was sighted their need. They had the Continental Congress, although this governing body emerged from the revolution, serving the colonies well during revolution. The colonies having already become known as states, and these states namely the United States, by the Continental Congress. However, having won their liberty and having become governmentally quite insightive and innovative, they foresaw the need for establishing their nation new with a new government a betterment. Or, "a more perfect union" as was written in preamble of later established constitution. And this meant laws to obey, to respectfully obey. This meant not, especially during the conception of the new government, freedom. Because liberty from tyranny was their having. Already their having. Their need for liberty from, or freedom from, their having. This was done. Freedom needed no longer be their pursuance. A "more perfect union" meant a better government, a better ruling. Life a better experience, during the lifetime themselves, with ourselves their posterity in their foreseeing. None the more about liberty, or freedom, need they be.

After The Constitution was established, as afforded the opportunity for additional law by amendment, Thomas Jefferson offered the Bill of Rights and each in lawfully proper amendment form. However, these rights included only three freedoms specifically so. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of the press. That's it. That's all the freedoms specifically so that we constitutionally later had and now still have. And this was to prevent the possibility of tyranny befalling us, especially considering posterity, the future, than only afford life respectfully so, individually so, assuredly more fair. However, about freedom, freedom as themselves and for also as ourselves, America was nor is not constitutionally about, as could lead the citizenry into chaos or behavior by oneselves inevitably troubling the nation or falling the nation. Or at least inevitably occurring a life not nearly the quality of class, experiencively so, the great advancing class of those having founded America afforded and intended to afford.

By their voices, equal freedoms constitutionally, as reasonably so is not tyrannous to others. Equal freedoms for the voicing, for the hearing. For popularity, for respect and for encouragement. But certainly not each citizen freedom, as only freedom identificationally so. And especially not "without limits" nor "without boundaries". Others are, than only oneself, and by entitlement of citizenship rightfully so.

And respecting the whole truth, ignorable not is freedom from slavery. From slavery, slavery as is an experience tyrannous so. Such beautiful liberty, successfully this. However, in America, such a pursuance serious so and honorable so is behind us, is in our past. Is done.

Pursuing freedom now, freedom from tyrannous experiences, is not the need. This is the truth, and clearly so.

Clearly so.    ...Cleary so? But if youth is for becoming freedom, while the rulings of the house of parenting is restricting so, binding so, unyielding not nearly enough! One needs, feels the need, somehow must, break free. Because such restricting so, binding so, unyielding not nearly enough is tyrannous! "Cannot our parents understand?    ...What wrong with them?!"

Insightive is that. And some see themselves as they were in their youth, than only the youth nowadays, by that. And this ables one to help oneself. However, returning to an answer for our voicings and our celebrating such a glorious past of nation, as we should be proud about...

Naturally so, and normally so, equal freedoms respects others. Accustomed with equal freedoms, quite often oneself is fair among others, and individually so, while this likens oneself doing nothing intentionally so to be worthy as an American. And because this is good, oneself is also a good person as an American much the like naturally so, as GOD blesses. And certainly, those religious so would not want to disrespect others another religion, by disrespecting them not a lie about their belief. Not lieing. And this, this is able, because of knowledge, the clear knowledge of equal freedoms, than because of a psychological effect as though programmed.

Freedom as nothing, nothing more to pursue. Though equal freedoms, these constitutionally are now, also now, and are real. Are something true.

With equal freedoms, and also the freedom others to go about their lives harassed not and harmed not, as is civil so, as is with civility so, certainly this is something, this matters, and in the distance of time matters positively so. Though perspectively, attentioning this intellectual perspective of truth, for acknowledging this intellectual perspective of truth, also the truth is, one is doing nothing to others, by respecting the freedom of others as that, though such a doing of nothing matters so, ables our nation's civility so. Freedom is a useful word for knowing ourselves still, experiencively ourselves still, while in truth a different knowing compared before.

Briefly the mention. Interesting is the existence of several religions on earth, than only one. Intelligently interesting. Are we serious with religious principles, such as respecting each oneselves not a lie, differences of others not truly harmful to ourselves respectable by ourselves? Or must we be specifically so "on the same side" or "the same faith" exactly so, to live in harmony among all those the earth? Like a test is this, certainly like, and much like a natural test the earth, each our resolves with the principles of the religions exemplified everyday by our behavior towards each other. Only loyalty with a religion not enough, more depthfully true ourselves the expectation of the divine, as is evident by the seriousness of elaboratively written divine guidances. We expect Heaven to be true, to be ever so real, and ourselves not disappointed. And we expect Heaven such a beautiful safe place wherein one is accepted as oneself, as love divine messages. Thus we should think each ourselves need not be true with divine principles for compatibility in such a place, but loyalty and allegiance are enough? Perhaps such a class of beings is, such a wondrously advanced class is, there in such a place beautiful and safe so. And their intelligence quite true. Great but also pragmatic so, for life an excellent experience everyday quite true.

Oneself with equal freedoms is oneself knowable by oneself as an American, and knowable with ease. And others appreciate oneself, the good person oneself accustomed with respecting equal freedoms, while most often this is unspoken as we each go about our own business, living our lives. Special attention to oneself is rarely afforded, if afforded at all, though one is such a matter, such an importance, such a worth. And the truth this ever so truly is. However, this is quite adult. Is quite the adult experience lifelong. Respecting equal freedoms, well that's the way we are, as Americans we are. And meant to be, by those having founded America. Fulfilling this, and not blinded but aware of ourselves, about ourselves, clearly seeing ourselves, and ourselves good, while ourselves such life vibrantly so. This we can be proud about, and with unlosting clarity truthfully so.

For clarity with true surety, more is for the reading. However, many other Americans still will voice freedom, unaware of the knowledge in this essay. Unlike your awareness, certainly so. In the future, and how will others respond? Well, America is by the people, than by any one of us. Individuality is.

That, and the likeliness of equal freedoms such an influence in the future. While then, again another youth is becoming an adult, and self reliance not yet the truth of oneself, dependent still to parenting, and some life orientation problems unavoidably so are still to occur to oneself, be experienced by oneself, as is normal during growth, during the years of becoming an adult. Though, such problems are not costly so. Not really costly so. A better sense of time, those already adults have, compared youth, although youth are sometimes anxious so, impatient so, wanting to already belong in life as an adult, to liken self reliant adults. To be oneself so and to liken self reliant adults so, but alas are yet not able with this. As should be respected about oneself by oneself, because this is the truth, oneself a youth still. And fair is the truth respected about oneself, about also oneself. Some rights, the like a self reliant adult, oneself yet not deserves.

Feeling one's oats, so to speak. Independent so, as oneself, a youth can want to be, but by the whole truth clearly is yet not independently oneself. Until an adult and self reliant, though experience will be needed for having faith in oneself with this, parents should be respected in their ruling, and including their ways of provided house and amenities as is fair.

By those youth freedom, trying oneselves so as freedom, becoming lost. Happiness their pursuance, their own happiness their pursuance as though clearly their right, already their inalienable right, as oneselves freedom true. As others must understand, must yield to. They know clearly well, the word fair? Most know nearly not fair for oneself, the like their parents aware of time so do. Certainly, some this is true, parents are a higher plane of knowing, their life experiences and also gathered knowledge a more, a more their children cannot yet recognize. And unavoidably so, cannot yet recognize. Sometimes a criticism of youthful thinking can seem valid, and perhaps sometimes is valid, while most often is not; this respecting those parents intentionally good of course.

Equal freedoms, this is what Americans are about in constitutional truth, than freedom. And this is an identification with class, and an identification relatively an ease. Especially accustomed with the hearing of the voicing, as one grows from child to adult. A behavioral class of person, of adult person, those founding America approved and also influenced. And also forwardly lead the world with, by their example. And this worldly was such an influence dynamically successful so, as was the real. This is our inheritance of worth.

We can refer to American constitutional life as a democracy, or something different if becomes different by the willful allowances of the people, while the everyday experience of respected equal freedoms affords life a much better quality, a much greater quality, compared each attempting to successfully be freedom. And to find themselves in that. And to find their able worth in life by that.

To find oneself in freedom is not nearly the like knowing thyself. As by honesty, knowing thyself. And especially not nearly the like knowing thyself in love, and depthfully further in marriage. In marriage by love as is mutually respectful so. And beautifully yielding so, by man than only by woman, caring for each other so and partnering with each other so.

Preparationally better for marriage, also marriage, is oneself raised by hearing equal freedoms repetitively so, for as oneself an American repetitively so, than only the lone word freedom for the living.

By the real, life in marriage by love is a plurality, but is also a oneness. A oneness like a singularity, but is not a singularity, because the oneness of marriage is not individually a singular experience nor a singular truth. And in marriage by love, though a oneness, the individuality of the other is valued so. By love the uniqueness of the other is seen so, and is valued so. While true freedom, in marriage each is not. By love, especially by love new, illusionally can seem freedom pure is, each a willingness so, while freedom pure individually so is becomingly each oneselves not. However, by the willingness of each, freedom is exercised in the agreement of partnership, partnership as marriage is divinely meant to be. A beautiful and enjoyable partnership, this true, while fundamentally a binding partnership for seriously respecting. Or obeying, if one must think as this.

Naturally so, and normally so, limits are by equal freedoms. Sometimes, oneself needs yield to another for the sake of another's freedoms respected. Respected too. And this closely likens the class of the divine, as is the influence of fairness, such fairness, by ourselves among ourselves. This as love, love in divine knowing, also influences oneself to consider, oneself to be.

So fair is she for me. And how I want so, my words and my gestures, to be more fair for her. To be compatible her so. And life for her, how I want to make ever so fair. Ever so pleasantly fair. A thought, certainly the like that thought, is not unique, but can seem unique so by a man in love, because personal so. Because depthfully personal so.

With wisdom is equal freedoms by the voices of many. And the repetition of such words, such messaging words, need not be feared, because such words are not losting but knowable. Knowable as oneself an American. And knowable as clearly so as is knowledge, as is heard knowledge, and simplistic knowledge intelligent so.

Though this is a more complete statement, perhaps with this you can now be, and with ease. Than this level of intelligence, before you so. Voicing the word freedom with the intention of popularity, respect and encouragement is not with wisdom. And celebrating the word freedom with the intention of popularity, respect and encouragement is not with wisdom. Especially not, with wisdom the highest as is divine. However, voicing the words equal freedoms with the intention of popularity, respect and encouragement is with wisdom. And celebrating the words equal freedoms with the intention of popularity, respect and encouragement is also with wisdom. Especially so, with wisdom the highest as is divine.

Much like equal rights, equal rights by law, are equal freedoms. And much more knowable are equal rights, as are purposed for our sakes, especially for all our sakes with time considered and respected, by the voicing of equal freedoms our familiarity.

Most intelligent is the influence of parenting and also those in government affording clear minds. Certainly, for the sake of nation longevity is this, than only for the sake of each individually so.

In footnote: The chasm between earth and heaven, as strongly suggested exists in the holy written of centuries ago, is also because of intelligence, than only a physical kind of existence. Earthy thinking and heavenly thinking different. However, this not recognizable by those of earth, unable to see beyond their own thinking, and thus interpretations follow, the need for intervention is also for the purpose of clearer communication, than only for discouraging those an enemy to the intentionally good. And this gives reason why loyalty was importanted so centuries ago, obeyance for following such loyalty, principles and meanings of divine communication not all nearly understandable enough by most, and thus not respectable enough by most, for life a betterment nearly as much as influentially the affordance. As an example, commandments can nowadays seem harsh, though centuries and centuries ago, the mentalities much different, from generations of  confined bondage the jews then having obeyance ingrained in them so, their freedom from bondage done, their behavior for life a betterment by them was ever so seriously guided so. Affording them freedom from tyranny, tyranny severe, and then leaving them the like abandoning them, as would have been freedom without direction for by their own, their greatly uneducated own, would have been irresponsible so.

I have reduced this website to mainly one page, those unfamiliar with me, but I expect that I eventually will be repopulating this website with more pages. However, when I have a book available, certainly a prominent notation will be on each of my two web sites' home pages. On this site and also on Posey Wilson .com.

contact

Will Of Freedom .com

Copyright 2006-2009 © Posey William Wilson Jr.
All rights are reserved for any commercial purpose. Exceptions are reference to and quotes with reference, of course.